Marty is a correctional officer at a federal prison. As a tool of intimidation, the inmates have formed a gang and continuously made threats to the officers and their families. Marty has never complied with the gangs' demands, which has caused great animosity between him and the gang members. One day, Maxwell, the leader of prison's gang, is to be released. Maxwell has told Marty that when he gets out, he is going to take his revenge on Marty by killing Marty's entire family. On the date of his release, Marty followed Maxwell to a liquor store. As Maxwell left the store, Marty followed him to a remote alley where Marty shot Maxwell six times in the back and neck. Marty's defense was that he stopped Maxwell before Maxwell could hurt Marty's family. Marty claims his action was in self-defense. Under what circumstances does the court recognize an individual's right to act in defense against another? According to the general rules of self-defense, is Marty justified in killing Maxwell? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q71: Give an example of a justification.
Q72: The judge presents his or her witnesses
Q73: A police officer may not use deadly
Q74: Mindy called the police reporting a robbery
Q75: What is the necessity defense?
Q77: Moral interest was identified as a theory
Q78: What is the difference between the Castle
Q79: What is the difference between the "retreat
Q80: Explain why affirmative defenses may be legitimate,
Q81: Summarize and discuss the People v. Goetz
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents