Aiesha went to the mall with the intention of buying a purse for her date on Friday night. She went into XYZ and found a black and brown leather purse that was large enough for her to fit a jacket and an extra pair of shoes. She liked big purses because she always wants to make sure she has everything she needs. She walks up to the counter and pays for the purse and exits the store. As she leaves an alarm goes off. A retail associate comes to check her bag and finds various costume jewelry pieces in each of the purse pockets. Aiesha did not put them there and was unaware of their presence. Nonetheless, is Aiesha guilty of shoplifting?
A) No, because chronological concurrence did not exist in this scenario.
B) Yes, because chronological concurrence did exist in this scenario.
C) No, because she was negligent.
D) Yes, because she had criminal intent at the same time she committed the criminal act.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: In all cases where the defendant's conduct
Q38: In order to be convicted of a
Q39: Public welfare offenses were designed to protect
Q40: All of the following are factors that
Q41: A criminal intent need NOT necessarily exist
Q43: The defendant is generally liable for unforeseeable
Q44: Recklessness involves an awareness of harm that
Q45: What is required for a strict liability
Q46: The law does NOT consider individuals who
Q47: The Model Penal Code established recklessly as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents