James lives in Chicago where parking can be difficult to find. James drives his car to work daily. After arriving home from work he was unable to find a parking space on the street and so he parked in an alleyway behind his home as he had done many times before. The next day, while James is at work, legislation passes to ban parking in alleyways for safety reasons. When he arrives at home he is easily able to find a parking space on the street directly in front of his property. As he is preparing dinner an officer appears at his front door and writes him a ticket based on the newly enacted law and the fact that the previous night, before the law was enacted, he had parked in the alley. Which statement applies?
A) This is an example of an ex post facto law and it is improper to hold James accountable for actions legal at the time they were committed.
B) This is an example of a bill of attainder and it is improper to hold James accountable for actions legal at the time they were committed.
C) This is an example of an ex post facto law and it is proper to hold James accountable for actions legal at the time they were committed.
D) This is an example of a bill of attainder and it is proper to hold James accountable for actions legal at the time they were committed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Gun rights activists contend that the second
Q26: A new ordinance limits habitation on certain
Q27: Which of the following activities would not
Q28: The holding in Kolender v. Lawson states
Q29: Adnon is arrested for possessing a firearm
Q31: Which of the following is not a
Q32: Timothy went to buy a gun and
Q33: The holding in District of Columbia v.
Q34: What are the three different tests under
Q35: Which of the following is not a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents