In early 2018, the U.S.Supreme Court heard arguments in a long-running dispute between Florida and Georgia.More specifically, Florida charged that its citizens and environment were being hurt by overconsumption of water in the ever-growing Atlanta area and through irrigation for farms in southern Georgia.The Court heard the arguments after designating an official known as a special master to hear facts of the case and make recommendations to the court.Based on what you have learned in this chapter, how did it most likely happen that the Court came to hear the case in such a unique way?
A) It could have gone to either a federal or state court, given the amount of damage claims involved, but the two parties agreed to hear it in a neutral setting before appealing to the Supreme Court.
B) The case involved questions about interstate commerce, and as such had to be heard by a lower court official first before being heard by the Supreme Court.
C) The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction for cases in which a state is a party, meaning that it may hear such cases first, which it did here, after receipt of recommendations.
D) Congress changed the Court's jurisdiction to allow disputes between states to be heard in this fashion.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Public law is a form of criminal
Q9: Most cases are settled before trial.
Q12: Losers in civil cases may be required
Q14: Defendants found guilty of civil wrongs can
Q20: The U.S. Supreme Court operates primarily as
Q44: Supreme Court justices who thoroughly disagree with
Q45: The majority ruling in favor of abortion
Q47: How are presidents most likely to have
Q52: At the federal level, the U.S.Circuit Courts
Q53: Prior judicial decisions that are applied to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents