In a 1997 case, Printz v.United States, the Supreme Court ruled that states were not required to help the federal government enforce a portion of a federal gun control law, and that the federal government could not demand such of states with any regulatory program.Officials in cities and states with more liberal-leaning populations have, since that time, cited this case to argue that cities may refuse to assist federal law enforcement in deportations of undocumented immigrants.Interestingly, however, Printz had reflected a more conservative view of the _____________.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In a 1997 case, Printz v.United States, the Supreme Court ruled that states were not required to help the federal government enforce a portion of a federal gun control law, and that the federal government could not demand such of states with any regulatory program.Officials in cities and states with more liberal-leaning populations have, since that time, cited this case to argue that cities may refuse to assist federal law enforcement in deportations of undocumented immigrants.Interestingly, however, Printz had reflected a more conservative view of the _____________.

In a 1997 Case, Printz V