A right to privacy, while recognized over time by federal judges, is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.It can be said that such a right is protected under the Constitution, all the same, because:
A) the Supreme Court, which has the final say in interpreting the document, has said it is.
B) Congress decided that it was necessary and proper to give Americans privacy protections under federal law.
C) the Ninth Amendment asserts that a failure to mention a right does not mean it is not possessed by the people.
D) more democracy in America brought about a greater judicial concern with individual liberty, despite the fact that judges are appointed, and serve lifetime appointments.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: The framers of the Constitution worried that
Q37: A legislative assembly, such as Congress, that
Q38: To give federal judges some isolation from
Q39: The terms of appointments for senators are
Q40: Why might the delegates to the Constitutional
Q42: Congress can overturn a presidential veto only
Q43: Imagine that states could still engage in
Q44: Different constituencies elect senators and representatives, and
Q45: The Eighteenth Amendment, which prohibited the manufacture,
Q46: The First Amendment to the Constitution was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents