Think back to the example in the textbook, when Kim says that Art 391 is boring. Under which of the following conditions are we most likely to make a situational attribution that Art 391 is indeed boring?
A)When consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus are all low.
B)When consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus are all high.
C)When consistency is high and distinctiveness and consensus are both low.
D)When consensus is high and distinctiveness and consistency are both low.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

When consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus are all high, it suggests that Kim always finds Art 391 boring (high consistency), does not find other courses boring (high distinctiveness), and that others also find Art 391 boring (high consensus), leading us to attribute the boredom to the situation (the course itself) rather than to Kim.

Think Back to the Example in the Textbook, When Kim