Rashid saw Charles "rear-end" Francine's car at a stop sign. Immediately following the accident he told Charles that he would testify that Francine had been over the white line and had backed up into Charles, if Charles paid him $200. Charles agreed and Rashid provided his testimony in court. The police can prove Rashid is lying.
A) Francine could successfully sue Rashid for slander.
B) Francine could successfully sue Rashid for slander and would be awarded punitive damages.
C) Francine would lose a slander suit because Rashid could raise the defence of absolute privilege, though Rashid could be charged with the crime of perjury.
D) Francine would lose a slander suit because Rashid could raise the defence of qualified privilege, although Rashid could be charged with the crime of perjury.
E) If Rashid had lied only out of friendship, rather than for money, he could not be sued by Francine nor charged by the police.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Nadeem was a blogger who provided comments
Q11: Andy entered a small restaurant and sat
Q12: Karim was replacing the light bulb inside
Q13: Dan had been notified by his landlord,
Q14: Terry responded to a mail-order advertisement for
Q16: Andy entered a small restaurant and sat
Q17: An intentional tort exists under which of
Q18: Darren sells counterfeit Gucci watches on a
Q19: While driving, Charles "rear-ended" Francine's car at
Q20: Which of the following fact patterns does
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents