In response to the growing number of traffic deaths resulting from alcohol-related accidents, many provinces amended existing laws to permit their police forces to conduct arbitrary roadside checks to try to discourage drunk driving. When this practice was challenged in the courts as an infringement of s. 9 of the Charter,
A) counsel for the Crown would successfully argue that the practice could be continued indefinitely because of s. 33 of the Constitution, which allows the provinces to exempt the legislation from the application of the Charter.
B) counsel for the Crown would argue that the roadside checks are permissible on the basis of s. 1 of the Charter.
C) the challenging party, a motorist who had been stopped and found to have excessive blood alcohol levels, would successfully argue that the legislation violates his s. 6 mobility rights.
D) the Crown would argue s. 33 and s. 1.
E) All of the answers are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The Alberta Court of Appeal wrote a
Q8: The Simpson brothers have applied to the
Q9: The government of Saskatchewan passed a statute
Q10: Under the Canadian Constitution the federal government
Q11: Mary is suing Arthur because he breached
Q13: A small Ontario town passes a bylaw
Q14: Which Canadian province does not utilize the
Q15: If it were decided to amend the
Q16: Nova Scotia has rules of court that
Q17: Jill has written a mathematics textbook. Under
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents