Paul sees Dan repeatedly enter Paul's land at least twice a week over a six-month period.The only time Dan knew that Paul objected was when Paul sued Dan for trespass to land.________.
A) There was a trespass to land because Dan did not have permission to enter Paul's land.
B) The action for trespass to land will fail because Paul's silence could reasonably be interpreted as consent to enter the land.
C) There was a trespass to land because Dan carelessly interpreted Paul's silence as consent.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: MATCHING
-reasonable force to protect oneself
A)volenti non fit
Q4: A defense is the response of a
Q5: MATCHING
-a 1983 action
A)volenti non fit injuria
B)coercion
C)implied consent
D)informed
Q6: The same conduct of the defendant can
Q7: MATCHING
-reasonable steps to protect third persons
A)volenti non
Q9: You can never use the defense of
Q10: Reasonable force in self-defense can never include
Q11: In most states, when you use the
Q12: Which of the following is not an
Q13: Judges and legislators have absolute official immunity
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents