MATCHING
-dissenting opinion in Palsgraf
A) duty
B) foreseeable plaintiff
C) unforeseeable plaintiff
D) Cardozo test
E) Andrews
F) zone of danger
G) misfeasance
H) nonfeasance
I) malfeasance
J) special relationship
K) undertaking
L) gratuitous
M) consideration
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: MATCHING
-duty owed to someone in the zone
Q5: MATCHING
-affirmative conduct that is improper or unreasonable
A)duty
B)foreseeable
Q6: Without a special relationship, the existence of
Q7: The duty of reasonable care requires the
Q8: An unforeseeable plaintiff is someone who was
Q10: Those who engage in gratuitous undertakings do
Q12: Palsgraf is a famous case that helped
Q13: MATCHING
-someone not in the zone of danger
A)duty
B)foreseeable
Q14: Nonfeasance can never be the basis of
Q16: MATCHING
-the area within which it is foreseeable
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents