In evaluating judgments of dangerousness for the purpose of civil commitment, what type of validity is most appropriate?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Predictive validity is the most appropriate type of validity when evaluating judgments of dangerousness for civil commitment as it assesses how accurately a judgment can predict future behavior. This is essential in determining whether an individual should be committed for the safety of themselves and others. Etiological validity focuses on identifying the causes of the behavior, concurrent validity assesses how well judgments align with current criteria or standards, and treatment validity evaluates the effectiveness of intervention in reducing the behavior - all of which may not be as applicable in the specific context of civil commitment for dangerousness.

In Evaluating Judgments of Dangerousness for the Purpose of Civil