In Casias v.Wal-Mart Stores,plaintiff Casias,a cancer patient and Wal-Mart employee,was prescribed medical marijuana for his symptoms by his physician,pursuant to the state's new medical marijuana law.Upon being injured at work,he was given a blood test which showed marijuana in his system.He was fired,and sued for wrongful termination.The court ruled:
A) for the Plaintiff because he had a valid state medical marijuana registry card to show that he was authorized to use medical marijuana
B) for the Plaintiff because he did not cause his own injury at work
C) for Wal-Mart, because the state law did not change employment-at-will
D) for Wal-Mart, because plaintiff's marijuana use led to his injury
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Under U.S.employment laws,employees have the right to:
A)not
Q8: In EEOC v AutoZone, the EEOC sued
Q9: A mandatory arbitration agreement which provides that
Q10: Regarding arbitration,which of the following statements is
Q11: In Nino v The Jewelry Exchange,plaintiff bank
Q12: Your firm has just gotten a contract
Q15: Which of the following provisions,if included in
Q17: Which of the following is generally true
Q18: An employer considering whether to use mandatory
Q20: Which of the following is true regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents