In NAACP v. North Hudson Regional Fire & Rescue , the NAACP sued the North Hudson fire department for disparate impact discrimination because the fire department required that potential firefighters live in North Hudson. In North Hudson, only 3% of the population was African-American, while in the Tri-county area, 37.4% of protective services workers were African-American. North Hudson claimed that residency was a business necessity. The court ruled:
A) for the NAACP, because there were less discriminatory means of achieving the fire department's goals
B) for the NAACP, because the fire department intentionally discriminated based on race
C) for the North Hudson Fire Department, because it was reasonable to require firefighters to live in the city so that they were familiar with streets and buildings
D) for the North Hudson Fire Department, because the NAACP had not proved a prima facie case of discrimination
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Which of the following is a difference
Q15: A landscaping company stops by the Home
Q16: Determining whether discrimination has occurred during recruitment
Q17: In Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics , a
Q18: For purposes of determining discrimination in recruitment,
Q20: Unless there is direct evidence of a
Q21: Which of the following practices would be
Q22: In order to prevent discrimination against applicants
Q23: Why is each of the following good
Q24: You have been hired by the owners
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents