In a case in which the employee claimed harassment by her supervisor in which he altered her work her work hours with the knowledge that doing so would adversely affect her hypoglycemia; frequently stood at her desk and stared angrily at her; startled her by pounding on her desk with his fist; criticized her work unfairly; and yelled at her in front of co-workers,the court ruled that:
A) no sexual harassment was proven, because no demand for sexual favors was made
B) no sexual harassment was proven, because no hostile environment was created
C) a hostile environment was created by the supervisor's conduct
D) no harassment could be proven without verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: The plaintiff in a harassment case must
Q14: Which of the following is true of
Q15: Which of the following is part of
Q16: XXIn the case in which a woman
Q17: Which of the following should be included
Q19: The primary difference between harassment that results
Q20: When a female supervisor demands sexual favors
Q22: 1. Why is each of the following
Q23: 1. Why is each of the following
Q26: How does employer liability for harassment by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents