In R. Williams Construction Co. v OSHRC, a trench collapsed at a construction site, killing one worker, and severely injuring another. A hydraulic jack supporting the wall had been removed, and the walls of the trench were not sloped, as required by OSHA regulations. The construction firm argued that, although it did not know what the OSHA requirements were, its employees had much work experience and common sense, and they talked about safety "all the time." The OSHRC ruled:
A) for the employer, because of the several years of experience of its workers
B) for the employer, because the employees frequently talked about safety
C) for the workers, because there was a death and a serious injury
D) for the workers, because OSHA regulations applied, and it is not a defense that the firm did not know about OSHA regulations
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following is true of
Q2: A principal objective of the Occupational Safety
Q4: Which of the following is true of
Q5: The least effective thing an employer can
Q6: Ergonomic hazards _:
A)are partially addressed by OSHA's
Q7: Which of the following is true of
Q8: The OSH Act created two new agencies.
Q9: Regarding OSHA inspections, which of the following
Q10: Regarding Workers' Compensation, which of the following
Q11: Which of the following agencies was NOT
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents