Which of the following most accurately describes the constitutional standard articulated in 1984 by the U.S. Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington for determining whether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel?
A) Whether counsel's efforts in representing the defendant were so incompetent as to constitute a "farce or mockery of justice."
B) Whether the "totality of circumstances" of the defendant's trial evidenced a strategy by defense counsel disfavored by the judge who conducted the trial.
C) Whether defense counsel made errors so serious that he or she was not properly functioning as guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and whether such deficient performance prejudiced the defense.
D) Whether the defense counsel's decision in advising the defendant not to testify in his or her behalf was a prudent strategy for the defense.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Prior to the 20th century, federal habeas
Q19: The Supreme Court has held that indigent
Q20: Just as a defendant may appeal a
Q21: Which of the following issues are appropriately
Q22: The U.S. Supreme Court may review a
Q24: Most decisions of appellate courts are published
Q25: In the United States Courts of Appeals,
Q26: Which one of the following statements concerning
Q27: Counsel may utilize motions to request relief
Q28: Petitions for federal habeas corpus review most
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents