The trial of famous football star Oxford Jack Wilson, accused of killing his brother-in-law, is underway. Prosecutors, frustrated by a pre-trial decision that excluded their key DNA evidence, begin taking some risks. On direct examination, they ask a doctor the following question: "So when you read a report of DNA results from the night of the murder, you saw that the defendant's DNA matched blood evidence at the scene, correct?" Next, while questioning a police officer on direct examination, the prosecutors play an audiotape of a phone conversation between Oxford Jack's wife and her now-deceased brother. This audiotape includes the wife discussing fears that her husband might be a violent man. However, Oxford Jack's wife is not actually able to appear in person because she has fled the country, fearing for her safety. Finally, during closing arguments, the prosecutor refers to Oxford Jack as a "monster both on and off the football field." Answer the following questions about what has taken place in this trial.
-Which of the following is the most likely grounds for defense counsel to invoke when objecting to the question asked of the doctor?
A) hearsay
B) Asks for an opinion
C) Leading question
D) Best Evidence Rule
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: Critical Thinking:
Famous football star Oxford Jack Wilson
Q63: The trial of famous football star Oxford
Q64: Completion:
-In Batson v. Kentucky (1986), the Supreme
Q65: Critical Thinking:
Famous football star Oxford Jack Wilson
Q66: Critical Thinking:
Famous football star Oxford Jack Wilson
Q68: Completion:
-A question that suggests an answer to
Q69: Critical Thinking:
Famous football star Oxford Jack Wilson
Q70: The trial of famous football star Oxford
Q71: The trial of famous football star Oxford
Q72: Completion:
-Testimony by a witness as to facts
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents