U.S.Supreme Court Justices may disagree with the Court's conclusion.They may:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Justices who disagree with the Court's conclusion have the option to write a dissenting opinion, which allows them to explain their reasoning and provide an alternative view. This is often seen as the most effective way for a Justice to express their disagreement and potentially influence future decisions. Writing a concurring opinion would only be appropriate if the Justice agrees with the outcome of the case but has different reasons for reaching that conclusion. Writing an oral briefing or a "white paper" are not standard options for Justices to express their disagreement.

USSupreme Court Justices May Disagree with the Court's Conclusion