There is ample evidence that jurors in deliberation discuss insurance coverage when considering how much to award damages. Which of the following is a reasonable statement regarding these discussions?
A) Jurors should have this discussion as an award is required to be reduced by the amount already covered by the plaintiff's insurance.
B) Jurors should have this discussion because it is reasonable, although not required, for them to reduce the award amount because of insurance coverage.
C) Jurors should not have this discussion as the amount of insurance coverage is not relevant to the question of the amount of damages to award.
D) Jurors should not have this discussion as the true amount of insurance coverage is not usually available to jurors.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Researchers investigating the effects of expert testimony
Q28: The psychological concept, reactance, may be used
Q29: The defendant's conduct (i.e., were his or
Q30: Your knowledge of "anchor points" helps you
Q31: Robbennolt (2000)found that people attribute greater responsibility
Q33: According to the Arizona study, discussion about
Q34: What is mentioned in the principle of
Q35: Which state was the first to finalize
Q36: Jurors are not supposed to consider the
Q37: According to Professors Diamond and Vidmar (2001),
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents