One of the proposed reforms regarding expert testimony has been to bar any reference to "expert" testimony, and instead refer to

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Referring to "expert" testimony may prejudge the credibility of the witness and lead jurors to believe that their opinions are more reliable than those of non-experts. Therefore, referring to "opinion" testimony instead of "expert" testimony can help to level the playing field and ensure that all witnesses are evaluated based on the quality of their testimony rather than their credentials. Options A, B, and D do not address this issue and may still perpetuate the idea that the witness is an expert with more reliable opinions.

One of the Proposed Reforms Regarding Expert Testimony Has Been