In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court held that any confession resulting from an in-custody interrogation was admissible in court only if it was considered voluntary and the police had taken steps to ensure the suspect's protection from self-incrimination.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that for a confession to be admissible, the suspect must be informed of their rights (the Miranda rights), including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, to protect against self-incrimination and ensure the confession is voluntary.

In Miranda V