The idea that decisions by federal judges appointed by Democratic presidents differ from those of judges appointed by Republican presidents suggests that

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The idea that decisions by federal judges appointed by Democratic presidents differ from those of judges appointed by Republican presidents suggests that both an attitudinal model of decision making is at work and judges view their cases in light of their attitudes. This is because judges are likely to have different attitudes and ideologies based on their party affiliation, and these attitudes can shape their decision-making processes. The attitudinal model argues that judges' decisions are primarily driven by their personal attitudes and values rather than legal precedent, which can lead to predictable differences in decision-making based on political affiliation.

The Idea That Decisions by Federal Judges Appointed by Democratic