Mincey v.Arizona established that:
A) officers may always search the premises when the search is associated with an arrest.
B) while officers are on the premises pursuing their legitimate emergency activities, any evidence in plain view may be seized.
C) searching a location where there are illegal drugs is legal without a search warrant, owing to special federal antidrug legislation.
D) officers may not seize evidence they find in plain view while pursuing emergency activities.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: In which 1984 case did the Supreme
Q14: Physical evidence is:
A)blood-spattered.
B)on a person.
C)anything material and
Q15: Hopefully, a well-organized, thorough, and proper organization
Q16: Every lawful arrest is accompanied by a
Q17: Which rule states that courts will not
Q19: A search conducted with a warrant must
Q20: Consent to search is valid only if
Q21: In Wyoming v.Houghton, the court ruled that
Q22: Officers may not seize contraband they discover
Q23: When police take custody of a vehicle,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents