When a state holds a resource that is available for the free use of the general public, a court will look with considerable skepticism upon any government conduct which is calculated either to reallocate that resource to more restricted uses or subject public uses to the self-interest of a private party.This statement relates to:
A) the law of eminent domain
B) the legality of exclusionary zoning ordinances.
C) the public trust doctrine.
D) the law of inverse condemnation.
E) none of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A Covenant is an oral or written
Q3: A restrictive covenant will still be enforced
Q4: Unlike the government's actual physical taking of
Q5: Federal and state governments use three methods
Q6: A restrictive covenant may not establish a
Q7: A nonconforming use is different from a
Q8: Even though restrictive covenants are agreements made
Q9: In order for a variance to be
Q10: In exclusionary zoning cases, all courts have
Q11: Carl, an avid environmentalist, sued a large
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents