In _____________, the Supreme Court held that a city had taken private property without just compensation where the city was unwilling to grant a development because the owner refused to dedicate part of the land to a public use.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This question is asking for the Supreme Court case that dealt with a city taking private property without just compensation due to the owner's refusal to dedicate part of the land to a public use. The case that fits this description is Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994), in which the Supreme Court held that the city could not require Dolan to dedicate a portion of her property as a public greenway in exchange for a building permit for her store without engaging in the proper analysis under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. Therefore, Choice D is the correct answer.

In _____________, the Supreme Court Held That a City Had