The U.S.Supreme Court's ruling in defined "reasonable" suspicion in stopandfrisk situations.

Question

The U.S.Supreme Court's ruling in defined "reasonable" suspicion in stop­and­frisk situations.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Terry v. Ohio (1968), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that in stop-and-frisk situations, "reasonable suspicion" must be based on specific and articulable facts that lead an officer to believe that criminal activity is afoot. This ruling established the legal precedent for the use of stop-and-frisk by law enforcement.

The USSupreme Court's Ruling in Defined "Reasonable" Suspicion in Stop­and­frisk Situations

The USSupreme Court's Ruling in Defined "Reasonable" Suspicion in Stopandfrisk Situations