In the Laidlaw v.Friends of the Earth case, in which the U.S.Supreme Court ruled on the issue of standing to sue by environmental groups:
A) the Court ruled for the first time that a party seeking review must demonstrate that she suffered an actual injury.
B) the majority in the Court was accused by one member of taking a "slash and burn expedition through the law of environmental standing."
C) the reaction of environmental groups was positive because the case allowed a more relaxed standard for those seeking standing to sue.
D) two of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: In the 1990s, the majority of responsible
Q12: Under the National Environmental Policy Act, an
Q14: Under CERCLA, a past owner of contaminated
Q17: Under CERCLA, mortgage lenders today no longer
Q19: A lumber company requested from the U.S.Forest
Q20: Although the Environmental Protection Agency is an
Q21: Under the Small Business Liability Relief and
Q22: The EPA has ordered Joyce to either
Q24: In the 1990s, an in-depth environmental justice
Q25: All of the following are true regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents