Case study 6.3
drinking, driving, and the supreme court
For Questions use the following narrative
Narrative: Case study 6.3 summary
This case study involves a decision made by the Supreme Court based on statistical evidence.In the early 1970s, a young man between 18 and 20 years old challenged an Oklahoma state law prohibiting the sale of 3.2% beer to males under 21 while allowing its sale to females of the same age group.The Court ruled the law unconstitutional.They considered two sets of data in making their decision.The first data set consisted of the number of arrests for driving under the influence and for drunkenness for most of the state of Oklahoma from September 1 to December 31, 1973, along with population figures.Based on those figures they determined that 2% of all males aged 18-21 were arrested for one of the two offenses mentioned, compared to only 0.18% of the young female population.The second set of data came from a "random roadside survey" of cars on the streets and highways around Oklahoma City during August 1972 and August 1973.11.4% of the males under 21 had a blood alcohol level over .01, compared to 9.4% of the females under 21.

-{Case study 6.3 narrative} Which of the following describes difficulties with one or both of the studies in this case?

Question

Case study 6.3
drinking, driving, and the supreme court
For Questions use the following narrative
Narrative: Case study 6.3 summary
This case study involves a decision made by the Supreme Court based on statistical evidence.In the early 1970s, a young man between 18 and 20 years old challenged an Oklahoma state law prohibiting the sale of 3.2% beer to males under 21 while allowing its sale to females of the same age group.The Court ruled the law unconstitutional.They considered two sets of data in making their decision.The first data set consisted of the number of arrests for driving under the influence and for drunkenness for most of the state of Oklahoma from September 1 to December 31, 1973, along with population figures.Based on those figures they determined that 2% of all males aged 18-21 were arrested for one of the two offenses mentioned, compared to only 0.18% of the young female population.The second set of data came from a "random roadside survey" of cars on the streets and highways around Oklahoma City during August 1972 and August 1973.11.4% of the males under 21 had a blood alcohol level over .01, compared to 9.4% of the females under 21.

-{Case study 6.3 narrative} Which of the following describes difficulties with one or both of the studies in this case?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Both studies have limitations in terms of generalizability, confounding variables, and sampling problems. The first study only looked at arrests for DUI and drunkenness in one state during a limited time period, and did not account for other factors that could contribute to these arrest rates. The second study only looked at drivers in one specific area during two months of the year, and did not include non-drivers or consider factors such as time of day or day of the week. These limitations make it difficult to draw broad conclusions from the data.

Case Study 6.3 Drinking, Driving, and the Supreme Court