Suppose a scientist has formulated a conclusion about the possible spread of a disease, but a few pieces of evidence don't fit the theory. What should the scientist do?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

It is important for the scientist to be transparent about the evidence that doesn't fit their theory. Calling attention to the anomalous data can lead to further investigation and potentially revise or refine the theory. Ignoring the evidence or rewording the conclusion to fit the data can lead to false conclusions and hinder scientific progress. Scrapping the whole thing may be an option, but only after thorough investigation of the anomalous data and attempting to reconcile it with the theory.

Suppose a Scientist Has Formulated a Conclusion About the Possible