A court hearing a contractual dispute has determined that an ambiguous term must be construed against the party drafting the agreement.Which of the following would the judge most likely state in his decision as being the policy rationale for the court's finding?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The policy rationale for construing ambiguous terms against the party drafting the agreement is that the framer should bear the risk of nebulous language. This approach is based on the principle that the drafter has the opportunity to clarify any unclear terms before the agreement is finalized and should bear the responsibility for any ambiguities that arise. This policy rationale is consistent with the broader aim of contract law to allocate risk and responsibility among the parties in a fair and transparent manner.

A Court Hearing a Contractual Dispute Has Determined That an Ambiguous