In what manner could you reasonably expect a court to apply the parole evidence rule when asked to interpret the meaning of a nebulous term in a written contract?
A) Abide by the rule and use its discretion to infer a clarification of the term.
B) Disregard the rule and allow extrinsic evidence to resolve the ambiguity.
C) Abide by the rule and use its discretion to apply implied terms for clarification.
D) Disregard the rule and apply the reasonable person test to interpret the term.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Which of the following would a negotiator
Q32: The parole evidence rule prohibits introduction of
Q33: Why would a businessperson use contractual terms
Q33: Which of the following would establish that
Q34: Marty has made his acceptance of an
Q36: Which of the following would automatically end
Q36: Kramer and Biff entered into a formal
Q38: Under the UEEA,which of the following would
Q39: Which of the following would provide that
Q40: Which of the following would have to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents