In the case of Atlas Supply Co.of Canada v.Yarmouth Equipment (1991) ,103 N.S.R.(2d) 1 (N.S.C.A.) ,disallowed reliance on the defendant's exclusion clauses to prevent evidence of the plaintiff's reliance on misleading information provided by the defendant.The dissenting appellant court judge cautioned against setting aside business deals such as this one.What was the dissenting appellant court judge advocating by taking this position?
A) that a small businessperson needs protection from unconscionable big businesses
B) acceptance of bad faith misrepresentations as a legal commercial negotiating practice
C) acceptance of unconscionable misrepresentations as grounds to set aside a contract
D) that a small businessperson is disadvantaged when dealing with a multinational business
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Cory,aged 17,plays hockey under contract with the
Q13: In what way is a void contract
Q14: Which of the following would affect the
Q15: In the case of Greater Fredericton Airport
Q16: Which of the following exemplifies what is
Q19: Which of the following would your law
Q20: With respect to contractual relationships,which of the
Q21: A seller unknowingly made a misrepresentation during
Q22: With respect to misrepresentation of relevant facts,how
Q23: Which of the following criteria must be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents