In a recent 2009 ruling,the Supreme Court of Canada found it necessary to direct that judges in lower courts were prohibited from redrafting overly broad non-competition clauses to make them legal and enforceable,stating that such clauses are simply and utterly unenforceable.Why did the Supreme Court find it necessary to invoke this prohibition?
A) to restate policy that vague or ambiguous clauses are unenforceable
B) such clauses improperly bind employees unable to afford litigation costs
C) such clauses are difficult to prove when the meaning is in fact unclear
D) to restate a central policy objective to facilitate drafting of broad clauses
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Johan is negotiating the possible sale of
Q26: Most provincial jurisdictions in Canada have enacted
Q27: Under the classic model of illegality,a freely
Q28: A judge has determined that offending portions
Q28: Which of the following is a valid
Q29: Which of the following could you reasonably
Q32: Which of the following would your law
Q34: Which of the following categories of actionable
Q36: In common law,contracts that unduly interfere with
Q40: What was the intended purpose of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents