Why did the Supreme Court of Canada grant leave to hear the case of London Drugs Limited v.Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd.(1992) ,97
D.L.R.(4th) 261 (S.C.C.) ?
A) to restrict employee liability relative to the doctrine of privity of contract
B) to ensure employee exclusion clauses are no longer recognized by the lower courts
C) to restrict employee liability relative to the doctrine of vicarious liability
D) to ensure employer exclusion clauses are no longer recognized by the lower courts
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Corinne Busco is the owner of Corinne's
Q9: Donelle agreed to rent her cottage to
Q10: Two financial institutions unknowingly advanced loans in
Q11: Which of the following would disentitle a
Q12: Which statement describes a distinguishing feature of
Q14: A courier employed by Jack's Deliveries delivered
Q15: Rumie paid a $5000 retainer to a
Q16: A flood will require mining operations to
Q17: Which of the following is a distinguishing
Q18: Randall was wrongfully dismissed from his job
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents