Which of the following would your law professor most likely indicate as being a valid defence to a claim for damages for losses arising from an alleged negligent act?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The defence of reasonable unforeseeability or unpreventability suggests that the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen or prevented the loss or harm caused to the plaintiff. This defence focuses on whether the defendant took reasonable steps to prevent the harm or loss and whether the harm or loss was a result of unforeseeable circumstances. This defence is valid under the law if the defendant can show that it was reasonable for them to have acted in the way that they did, given the circumstances of the case.

Which of the Following Would Your Law Professor Most Likely