Which of the following would strongly support the avoidance of the imposition of strict liability for a statutory offence?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Reasonable care and due diligence can provide a defense against strict liability, as it shows that the offender took reasonable steps to prevent the commission of the offence. This would support the avoidance of strict liability, as it provides a way for individuals to avoid liability if they can show that they exercised reasonable care and due diligence. The other options do not necessarily support the avoidance of strict liability. Lack of moral blameworthiness, for example, might suggest that the offender should not be punished at all, rather than that they should not be subject to strict liability. Similarly, prospects of rehabilitation might suggest that the offender should be given a chance to reform, rather than that strict liability should be avoided. Media publication of the offence does not have any particular relevance to the question of whether or not strict liability should be imposed.

Which of the Following Would Strongly Support the Avoidance of the Imposition