In the case of RBC Dominion Securities Inc.v.Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.,2008 SCC 54,the court stated that "the duty does not necessarily extend to preventing parting employees from taking client information...." In this instance,what duty is the Supreme Court referring to?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court was referring to the duty of confidentiality, which involves protecting sensitive information but does not necessarily prevent employees from taking client information when they leave.

In the Case of RBC Dominion Securities Inc