In his decision in the case of a 55-year-old clerical worker with 35 years' experience,Mr.Justice McPherson's award of 20 months' reasonable notice on termination was viewed as a signal of the judiciary's willingness to re-examine the notice factors.That view became nebulous upon the Court of Appeal reducing the award to 12 months on appeal.Which of the following is a valid severe criticism of the Court of Appeal's decision in this matter?
A) It is repugnant to modern, contemporary Canadian social values.
B) An inappropriate weight should not be given to character of employment.
C) All factors used to determine reasonable notice are to be appropriately weighted.
D) It is obvious that enforcing employee rights is repugnant to Canada's judiciary.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Defendant's counsel argued his client's termination of
Q3: To terminate an employment relationship for cause,what
Q4: A court is hearing a matter regarding
Q5: Why are employees who have been terminated
Q6: According to policy,Celine's employer has accumulated a
Q7: Which of the following would an employment
Q8: If an employee were to breach the
Q10: Fatima has worked as a paralegal with
Q11: Which of the following are the primary
Q12: The case of Dowling v.Halifax (City of),[1998]
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents