In the case of Chalmers Suspensions International Ltd.v.B&B Automation Equipment Inc.,2008 CanLII 15767 (ON S.C.),the court determined,among other things,that the plaintiff's rejection of equipment and its claim for return of payments was justified.Which of the following most likely formed the basis for the court's finding in this instance?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court's finding that the plaintiff's rejection of equipment and claim for return of payments was justified suggests that there was a breach of contract. Option D is the most likely basis for the court's finding as it refers to a breach of an implied condition that goes to the root of the contract. This means that the defendant's breach was so serious that it went to the heart of the agreement between the parties. This breach may have given the plaintiff the right to reject the equipment and claim a refund of payments made. Options A and B may be relevant to establishing the parties' intentions and expectations, but do not necessarily speak to the breach of contract issue. Option C is also relevant to the sale of goods context but is not specific enough to indicate why the court found in favor of the plaintiff.

In the Case of Chalmers Suspensions International Ltd