In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court find that there was a taking for which the property owner was entitled to compensation?
A) a new zoning law that totally prohibited a property owner from building a house
B) a 32-month building moratorium on lakefront property
C) a city ordinance that placed restrictions on the development of individual historic landmarks, resulting in petitioner's inability to build offices and causing several million dollars in damages
D) Both a and c
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: The power of eminent domain
A)is extended to
Q11: Just compensation is generally determined by the
Q12: Case law that affects or impairs the
Q13: The government has the right to take
Q14: The obligation of a contract under the
Q15: The Takings Clause applies to both real
Q17: Whenever any government regulation results in a
Q18: Which of the following was not considered
Q19: The Supreme Court's expanded recognition of the
Q20: The power of eminent domain can be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents