In Board of Education V

In Board of Education v.Earls (2002) the U.S.Supreme Court cautioned that the desirability and wisdom of drug testing is an issue to be decided by local school boards, and said:

A) "Testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate concerns in preventing, deterring, and detecting drug use."
B) "Testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is not a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate concerns in preventing, deterring, and detecting drug use, and cannot be condoned."
C) "Drug testing is patently invasive and is thereby abolished."
D) "Drug testing is non-invasive and may be used regardless of the institution."