Use the Following Case Study to Answer Questions

Use the following case study to answer questions
These questions require comprehension of various sections of the chapter to answer, but are placed together here to keep them together with the case study.Specifically, questions 95-97 test on "How are body weight and body composition assessed?"; 98-100 on "What determines energy expenditure?"; and 101-104 on "Does macronutrient distribution matter?"
Case Study: Jim, a 21-year-old, medium-frame 6'2" senior weighing in at 205 lbs is a very active varsity wrestler majoring in psychology.He is participating in a "Hydration Study" that includes the collection of the following data: body composition analysis utilizing the Bod Pod, food/beverage intake via dietary assessment questionnaire, urine sample, and analysis of saliva.The following data have been provided to assist in answering the questions.
Bod Pod Results:
59% body water
86.7% lean mass
13.3% fat mass
Reference Values for Bod Pod:
Risky (high body fat) = men: >30%; women: >40%
Excess fat = men: 21%-30%; women: 31%-40%
Moderately lean = men: 13%-20%; women: 23%-30%
Lean = men: 9%-12%; women: 19%-22%
Ultra lean = men: 5%-8%; women: 15%-18%
Risky (low body fat) = men: <5%; women: <15%
24-Hour Recall:
3540 kcalories
177 grams protein
118 grams fat
Males: EER = 662 - [9.53 x Age (y) ] + PA x [(15.91 x weight in kg) + (539.6 x height in m) ]
PA Values: Sedentary = 1.0, Low Active = 1.11, Active = 1.25, Very Active = 1.48
-Based on his BMI, Jim would be considered:

A) within his ideal body weight range.
B) below his ideal body weight range.
C) above his ideal body weight range.
D) Not enough information provided to determine