Robinson v.California declared disproportionate punishments to be:
A) cruel and unusual.
B) constitutional.
C) unconstitutionally vague.
D) inconsistent with rehabilitation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Criminal acts that are wrong by their
Q20: The vagueness doctrine prohibits laws that:
A)violate the
Q21: Recognition that people normally intend the natural
Q22: A presumption is:
A)adequate for conviction.
B)the same thing
Q23: A permissive inference is:
A)a possible but not
Q25: The prosecution's responsibility to prove all elements
Q26: The preponderance of evidence is:
A)evidence that raises
Q27: The burden of production in a criminal
Q28: In Robinson v.California, the defendant's conviction for
Q29: The prosecution may use inferences that are:
A)rational,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents