Arbitration differs from mediation because the decision:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In arbitration, the decision made by the arbitrator is binding, meaning that both parties are legally bound to follow the decision reached. This is different from mediation, where the mediator only facilitates discussions between the parties and does not make a final decision. Also, the decision in arbitration is not made by a judge, but rather by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators. The decision is also not directly appealed to the supreme court, but rather must go through a more limited process of judicial review. Finally, the decision in arbitration is not always guaranteed to favor the plaintiff or any other party, but rather is based on the evidence and arguments presented. In arbitration, the decision made by the arbitrator(s) is binding, meaning the parties involved have to adhere to the decision. In contrast, mediation involves reaching a mutually agreed-upon solution without any binding decision-making power. B is incorrect because the decision in arbitration is not made by a judge but rather by an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators. C is incorrect because the decision does not always favor the plaintiff, but rather is based on the evidence presented by both parties. D is incorrect because arbitration decisions are not directly appealed to the supreme court but can only be appealed on very limited grounds in a court of law.

Arbitration Differs from Mediation Because the Decision