Critics argue that because of the exclusionary rule:
A)most cases get prosecuted
B)many cases get dropped by the prosecutor
C)grand juries fail to consider critical evidence
D)the use of DNA makes the exclusionary rule unnecessary

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The exclusionary rule prohibits the use of unlawfully obtained evidence in court. Therefore, if the prosecutor's case relies on such evidence, they may have to drop the case. This can lead to many cases being dropped by the prosecutor. The exclusionary rule requires that evidence obtained through illegal means be excluded from trial. This can result in cases being dropped by prosecutors if they do not have enough admissible evidence to secure a conviction. This can also lead to the exclusion of critical evidence, potentially hindering the ability of grand juries to make informed decisions. However, the use of DNA evidence has not made the exclusionary rule unnecessary, as there are still many other ways in which evidence can be obtained illegally.

Critics Argue That Because of the Exclusionary Rule