Which form of argument did Zeno use to show that the view that everything is always changing is absurd?
A) Reductio
B) False dilemma
C) Ad hominem
D) Division

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Zeno used the reductio form of argument to show that the view that everything is always changing is absurd. This form of argument involves assuming the opposite of the conclusion and demonstrating that this assumption leads to a contradiction or absurdity. Zeno's argument involved assuming that motion and change were real and demonstrating that this assumption leads to paradoxes such as Achilles and the Tortoise, which demonstrate that motion is impossible. Zeno used the reductio form of argument, also known as reductio ad absurdum, to show that the view that everything is always changing is absurd. He argued that if everything is always changing, then motion itself is impossible because any object that moves must travel through a series of "nows" or moments, each of which is static and unchanging. However, if everything is always changing, then there can be no fixed points of reference for motion, and therefore motion itself is impossible. This contradiction shows that the view that everything is always changing is absurd.

Which Form of Argument Did Zeno Use to Show That