In Cloutier V

In Cloutier v. Costco , Cloutier was fired for violation of a no facial jewelry (other than earrings) provision of the dress code. Costco was successful because:

A) Costco had no duty to accommodate because it could not do so without undue hardship
B) Costco made an offer to accommodate after Cloutier s adverse employment action and was therefore shielded from liability under Title VII
C) the Church of Body Modification was not a recognized church so Cloutier s beliefs did not fall under religious discrimination requiring accommodation
D) Cloutier s beliefs did not include worship or recognition of a supreme being or deity so they could not be considered religious thereby requiring accommodation
E) none of the above