In Nino V the Jewelry Exchange,plaintiff Bank Employee Sued Alleging

In Nino v The Jewelry Exchange,plaintiff bank employee sued alleging discrimination,and his employer sought to dismiss the suit,stating that the employee had signed a mandatory arbitration agreement,so that the suit should go to arbitration.The employee responded that the mandatory arbitration agreement he had signed was unconscionable,and therefore,unenforceable.Among other things,the employee alleged that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable because gave him only 5 days to make a demand for arbitration.The court ruled:

A) for the Plaintiff employee, because the agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable.
B) for the Plaintiff employee, because the arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable.
C) for the Defendant employer, because none of the provisions of the arbitration agreement was unconscionable.
D) for the Defendant employer because the unconscionable parts of the arbitration agreement could be stricken, and the arbitration could proceed.