In the Microsoft Antitrust Case, the Federal Government Said in Essence

In the Microsoft antitrust case, the federal government said in essence that

A) the mere presence of monopoly violated the Sherman Act, irrespective of Microsoft's behavior.
B) Microsoft was a "bad monopoly."
C) Microsoft was generally a "good monopoly" but that its tying contracts involving Internet Explorer violated the Clayton Act.
D) the case was similar to the U.S. Steel case of 1920.